RSS

No Chinaman must figure in the story

March 16

V. No Chinaman must figure in the story. To understand why, one should refer to the following section of the Detection Club’s Oath: “Do you promise to observe a seemly moderation in the use of Gangs, Conspiracies, Death-Rays, Ghosts, Hypnotism, Trap-Doors, Chinamen, Super-Criminals and Lunatics; and utterly and for ever to forswear Mysterious Poisons unknown to Science?”

— Father Knox’s Ten Commandments of Detective Fiction

记得小时候第一次读到Knox十诫,不明白为什么侦探小说里面不能有“中国人”。那时候还不晓得Chinaman是有贬义的称呼,就好像nigger之于黑人。后来逐渐知道Chinaman是指具有特异功能、神秘力量的“东方人”,不一定非得是中国人。Knox提出这一条,主要是针对Sax Rhomer的Dr. Fu Manchu。

Christianna Brand在Fog of Doubt的序言里再次提到Chinaman,给了明确的解释:

One of these was: “there shall be no Chinamen.” By this was meant that scenes and characters should be “real”; the Mysterious East, unknown poisons, anything that was not possible, credible, acceptable to the standards of every day life—all that was out.

另外强烈推荐这篇序言,里面有很多Brand写小说的心得。

 

Posted by on March 16, 2009 in Uncategorized

1 Comment

One response to “No Chinaman must figure in the story

  1. 陈维

    November 20, 2021 at 10:04 pm

    不知道fang大有没有看过Ernest Hamilton’s Four Tragedies of Memworth,就是诺克斯在第五诫提到过的有中国人出场但他觉得还不错的作品,因为这本书没有电子版且绝版多年,想知道诺克斯认可的中国人出场作品到底是怎么样的,从而一窥其对于种族的看法。因为就目前能挖掘的资料看,诺克斯第五诫归因于“神秘的东方力量”可能欠妥,更应该归因于“刻意刻画为丑陋的中国人出场肯定是幕后真凶”

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *